Defendant’s Right to Remain Silent at Sentencing in Municipal Court

It has been a custom is many municipal courts in New Jersey for the judge to turn to the defendant at the time of sentencing and ask the defendant as to his prior driving history.

This often occurs in the context DWI sentences, in which the prosecutor will inform the court that a search of the defendant’s abstract does not reveal any prior driving while intoxicated offenses. Often the court will than turn to the defendant, who’s represented by counsel, rather that is correct, and whether the defendant has been convicted of any DWI offenses in this or any other state.

I am surprised that in many cases the defense attorney does sits quite without objecting to this line of questioning by the judge. The defendant at the time of sentencing does not give up his 5th amendment right to remain silent. Pursuant to N.J.S.A. 2B:25-5.1 it is the prosecutor’s obligation to research the defendant’s prior driving record and report that information to the court. Neither, defense counsel, or the defendant has any obligation to waive his Fifth Amendment right to remain silent, or for the attorney to violate his attorney client privilege with his client to the court.

This blog is prepared as a public service by the Law Office of Vincent J. Sanzone, Jr., Esq., and is not intended to provide any specific legal opinion or advice to anyone reading this blog.

Vincent J. Sanzone, Jr., Esq.
YourCivilRights@gmail.com

New Jersey Criminal Lawyers, Union County Criminal Defense Attorney, Middlesex County Criminal Defense Attorney, NJ Criminal Attorneys, NJ Criminal Defense Attorneys, NJ Criminal Trial Attorney, Union County Criminal Defense Lawyers, NJ Federal Criminal Trial Attorneys, Criminal Lawyers NJ, Newark Criminal Lawyers, Jersey City Criminal Lawyers, Bergen County Criminal Lawyers, New Brunswick Criminal lawyers, Passaic County Criminal lawyers, NJ best criminal defense lawyers.

Previous
Previous

New Jersey Appellate Division Rejects Waterfront Commissions Legal Definition of “Inimical Association” as it Applies to an “Association” with an Alleged Organized Crime Figure

Next
Next

Press Release Hudson County Superior Court, December of 2014